FullText

Zoledronate dysregulates fatty acid metabolism in renal tubular epithelial cells to induce nephrotoxicity | SpringerLink window.Krux||((Krux=function(){Krux.q.push(arguments);}).q=[]); var dataLayer = [{ 'GA Key':"UA-26408784-1", 'Features':["leaderboardadverts","eventtracker"], 'Event Category':"Article", 'Open Access':"Y", 'Labs':"Y", 'DOI':"10.1007/s00204-017-2048-0", 'VG Wort Identifier':"vgzm.415900-10.1007-s00204-017-2048-0", 'HasAccess':"Y", 'Full HTML':"Y", 'Has Body':"Y", 'Static Hash':"1645515599", 'Has Preview':"N", 'user':{"license":{"businessPartnerID":[],"businessPartnerIDString":""}}, 'content':{"serial":{"eissn":"1432-0738","pissn":"0340-5761"},"type":"Article","category":{"pmc":{"primarySubject":"Biomedicine","primarySubjectCode":"B","secondarySubjects":{"1":"Pharmacology/Toxicology","2":"Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine","3":"Environmental Health","4":"Biomedicine, general"},"secondarySubjectCodes":{"1":"B21007","2":"H42001","3":"U18005","4":"B0000X"}},"sucode":"Biomedical and Life Sciences"}}, 'Access Type':"subscription", 'Page':"article", 'Bpids':"", 'Bpnames':"", 'SubjectCodes':"SCB, SCB21007, SCH42001, SCU18005, SCB0000X", 'session':{"authentication":{"loginStatus":"N"},"attributes":{"edition":"academic"}}, 'eventTrackerBaseUrl':"https://event-tracker.springernature.com", 'Keywords':"Zoledronate, TGFβ1 signaling, Fatty acid transporter, Lipid accumulation, Renal fibrosis", 'Country':"US", 'Journal Id':"204", 'Journal Title':"Archives of Toxicology", 'doi': "10.1007-s00204-017-2048-0", 'kwrd': ["Zoledronate","TGFβ1_signaling","Fatty_acid_transporter","Lipid_accumulation","Renal_fibrosis"], 'pmc': ["B","B21007","H42001","U18005","B0000X"], 'BPID': ["1"], 'ksg': Krux.segments, 'kuid': Krux.uid, }]; function OptanonWrapper() { dataLayer.push({ 'event' : 'onetrustActive' }); } (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-WCF9Z9'); Skip to main content Skip to sections This service is more advanced with JavaScript available, learn more at http://activatejavascript.org Advertisement Hide SpringerLink Search SpringerLink Search Home Log in Archives of Toxicology Download PDF Archives of ToxicologyJanuary 2018, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 469–485 | Cite asZoledronate dysregulates fatty acid metabolism in renal tubular epithelial cells to induce nephrotoxicityAuthorsAuthors and affiliationsLili ChengMengmeng GeZhou LanZhilong MaWenna ChiWenhua KuangKun SunXinbin ZhaoYe LiuYaqian FengYuedong HuangMaoguo LuoLiping LiBin ZhangXiaoyu HuLina XuXiaohui LiuYi HuoHaiteng DengJinliang YangQiaoran XiYonghui ZhangJulie A. SiegenthalerLigong ChenOpen AccessOrgan Toxicity and MechanismsFirst Online: 04 September 2017 2.1k Downloads 1 Citations AbstractZoledronate is a bisphosphonate that is widely used in the treatment of metabolic bone diseases. However, zoledronate induces significant nephrotoxicity associated with acute tubular necrosis and renal fibrosis when administered intravenously. There is speculation that zoledronate-induced nephrotoxicity may result from its pharmacological activity as an inhibitor of the mevalonate pathway but the molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. In this report, human proximal tubular HK-2 cells and mouse models were combined to dissect the molecular pathways underlying nephropathy caused by zoledronate treatments. Metabolomic and proteomic assays revealed that multiple cellular processes were significantly disrupted, including the TGFβ pathway, fatty acid metabolism and small GTPase signaling in zoledronate-treated HK-2 cells (50 μM) as compared with those in controls. Zoledronate treatments in cells (50 μM) and mice (3 mg/kg) increased TGFβ/Smad3 pathway activation to induce fibrosis and kidney injury, and specifically elevated lipid accumulation and expression of fibrotic proteins. Conversely, fatty acid transport protein Slc27a2 deficiency or co-administration of PPARA agonist fenofibrate (20 mg/kg) prevented zoledronate-induced lipid accumulation and kidney fibrosis in mice, indicating that over-expression of fatty acid transporter SLC27A2 and defective fatty acid β-oxidation following zoledronate treatments were significant factors contributing to its nephrotoxicity. These pharmacological and genetic studies provide an important mechanistic insight into zoledronate-associated kidney toxicity that will aid in development of therapeutic prevention and treatment options for this nephropathy.KeywordsZoledronate TGFβ1 signaling Fatty acid transporter Lipid accumulation Renal fibrosis Lili Cheng, Mengmeng Ge, and Zhou Lan have contributed equally to the work.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2048-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.IntroductionZoledronate is a highly potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that is commonly used to treat osteoporosis, hypercalcemia of malignancy and osteolytic bone metastases (Munier et al. 2005; Perazella and Markowitz 2008; Roelofs et al. 2006). It inhibits farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPPS), an enzyme in the mevalonate pathway for cholesterol biosynthesis, and this inhibition reduces post-translational lipid modification (prenylation) of small GTPases (Roelofs et al. 2006). Unbound zoledronate is excreted unmetabolized through the kidney (Markowitz et al. 2003; Munier et al. 2005). Despite the clinical importance of zoledronate in several therapeutic areas, numerous cases of zoledronate-associated nephrotoxicity have been reported, which are shown to lead to renal failure, acute tubular necrosis and renal fibrosis characterized by tubular cell degeneration, loss of brush border, and apoptosis, when given intravenously (Chang et al. 2003; Markowitz et al. 2003; McKay et al. 2014; Munier et al. 2005; Ott 2012; Papapetrou 2009; Perazella and Markowitz 2008; Verhulst et al. 2015). The mechanisms of zoledronate-induced kidney toxicity are thought to be similar to its pharmacological effects in osteoclasts. The inhibition of FPPS by zoledronate may cause reduced levels of prenylated proteins leading to reduced function of Na+-K+-ATPase, aberrant integrin signaling, impaired endosomal trafficking and, ultimately, apoptosis (Luhe et al. 2008; Ott 2012; Papapetrou 2009; Perazella and Markowitz 2008). Acute tubular necrosis and fibrosis are the primary pathologies observed in zoledronate-induced renal injury, with toxicity directed at the tubular epithelium (Bergner et al. 2015; Markowitz et al. 2003; Jennings et al. 2015). However, the mechanism underlying zoledronate-induced renal toxicity remains unclear.There is increasing evidence of a key role of disorders of fatty acid (FA) metabolism in the mechanism of renal disease and injury (Herman-Edelstein et al. 2014; Kang et al. 2015; Susztak et al. 2005). FA β-oxidation (FAO) is the major source of energy for healthy tubular epithelial cells (Kang et al. 2015), but excessive FA loads in kidney tissues result in toxicity in the proximal tubular epithelial cells and contribute to the development of tissue fibrosis and kidney disease (Kang et al. 2015; Susztak et al. 2005). TGFβ signaling, the main pathway in fibrosis development and acute renal failure (Bottinger and Bitzer 2002), plays a key role in pathogenic FAO in the kidney (Kang et al. 2015). It inhibits FAO to induce renal lipid accumulation by decreasing expression of PPAR and its signaling component PPARγ-coactivator 1 alpha (PPARGC1A), the critical transcription factors required for expression of FAO pathway enzymes (Kang et al. 2015).In this study, in vitro and in vivo models were employed to dissect the molecular mechanism of zoledronate-induced renal toxicity. Following zoledronate treatment of normal human kidney epithelial cells HK-2 cells, we used proteomics and metabolomics to systematically investigate the phenotypes and molecular pathways. We identified significant disruptions in the TGFβ pathway, FA metabolism and small GTPase signaling following zoledronate treatment of HK-2 cells. Using mouse models of zoledronate-induced renal toxicity, we showed that increased FA accumulation and fibrosis in zoledronate-treated animals were due to a TGFβ-mediated increase in renal FA transporter SLC27A2 and defective FAO. Collectively, our analyses provide compelling evidence that zoledronate-induced kidney fibrosis and tubulopathy are caused by over activation of TGFβ signaling pathways.Materials and methodsReagentsZoledronate and fenofibrate were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan); Human TGFβ1 was purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, USA) and SB431542 was obtained from Harveybio (Beijing, China); 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Biotechnology (St. Louis, MO, USA); Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit was obtained from KeyGEN Biotech. Co., Ltd (Nanjing, China); Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), Fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin–streptomycin, 0.25% trypsin and phosphate buffer saline (PBS) were purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA); Saline, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), periodic acid schiff (PAS) and Masson’s trichrome were purchased from Solarbio (Beijing, China), the Oil Red O (ORO) solution (0.5% in isopropanol) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Biotechnology; Human TGFβ1 ELISA kit was purchased from BOSTER (Wuhan, China). The antibodies as follows: TGFβ (CST-3709), p-SMAD3 (CST-9520), SMAD3 (BOSTER BM3559), Fibronectin (FN1) (BOSTER BA1771), Collagen I (BOSTER BA0325), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (CST-19245), ROCK (Abcam ab45171), Ras (Abcam ab52939), Cofilin (Abcam ab134963), NOX4 (BBI D121050), SLC27A2 (Proteintech 14048-1-AP), CD36 (CST-14347), Rho-GTPase antibody sampler kit (CST-9968), Combo Rho A/Rac1/Cdc42 Activation Assay Kit (Cytoskeleton BK030), SLC2A1 (CST-12939), PDHB (CST-3205), CPT1A (Proteintech 15184-1-AP), PPARA (BOSTER BA1691), β-Tubulin (EASYBIO BE0025), Na+-K+-ATPase (Abcam ab76020).Cell culturesHK-2 (CRL-2190) and HEK 293T (CRL-3216) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA); NRK-52E was given as a present by Prof. Baoxue Yang (Peking University). All the cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 IU/ml penicillin–streptomycin at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere with 5% CO2.Cell viability assayCell viability was measured by using MTT assay. Briefly, HK-2 cells were seeded into a 96-well plate and exposed to zoledronate (0, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 50 µM). After treatment for varying periods of time (24, 36, 48, 60, or 72 h), 20 μl MTT at 5 mg/ml was added to each well. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for another 4 h and then dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was added to each well. The absorbance was detected at 570 nm with a microplate reader (Molecular Devices SpectraMax M5, PerkinElmer, USA). Cell viability was expressed as a percentage of the control culture.Flow cytometry with Annexin V/PI stainingThe HK-2 cells were treated with zoledronate (0, 1, 10, 50 µM) for 48 h. Apoptosis rates were determined by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Briefly, cells were washed with PBS once and collected by centrifuging at 1,200×g for 5 min, and then incubated with Annexin V-FITC (dilution 1:50) and PI (dilution 1:50) (KeyGEN Biotech) in binding buffer for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. Double-stained cells were analyzed immediately using flow cytometry and identified as apoptotic cells.Proteomics of HK-2 cells with and without zoledronate treatmentAfter treatment with zoledronate (0 and 50 µM) for 48 h, cells were lysed using urea lysis buffer (Solarbio), and then were scraped and transferred to a 1.5 ml tube, incubated at 4 °C for 30 min, centrifuged for 10 min and protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford method. 200 mg of proteins from sample were reduced with 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and alkylated with 5.5 mM iodoacetamide. Proteins were digested with trypsin for overnight, and stopped by 10% trifluoroacetic acid. The peptides were desalted using C18 Sep-Pak cartridges and eluted with 1 ml methanol. After centrifugation, peptides were redissolved in tetraethylammonium bromide and labeled using TMT sixplex labeling reagent. The TMT-labeled peptides were combined and desalted by C18 Sep-Pak cartridges. The fractions were centrifuged and analyzed by LC–MS/MS. The instruments and the data analysis methods were the same as described previously (Zhao et al. 2017).Metabolomics of HK-2 cells with and without zoledronate treatmentAfter treatment with zoledronate (0 and 50 µM) for 48 h, HK-2 cells were washed three times by PBS, and then 1 ml of 80% methanol was added and incubated at −80 °C for 3 h. Cells were harvested and isolated by centrifugation at 14,000×g for 20 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration of the pellet was measured by the BCA assay kit (Solarbio) for normalization. The metabolite-containing supernatant of cells was transferred to a new tube and dried under nitrogen flow. The dried samples were stored in −80 °C freezer for subsequent analysis. The instruments and the data analysis methods were the same as described previously (Zhao et al. 2017).Treatment of zoledronate or TGFβ1 and TGFβ receptor I inhibitor SB431542HK-2 cells were seeded into 60 mm dishes and exposed to zoledronate (0, 50 µM) or human TGFβ1 (1 ng/ml) at 37 °C for 48 h, and then SB431542 (10 µM) treatment or DMSO control was added to the cell culture supernatant and harvested 1 h later for analysis.Examination of ultrastructural changes by transmission electron microscopy (TEM)HK-2 cells were treated 48 h with zoledronate and then chemically fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde buffered in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.2. Cells were harvested with a cell scraper, washed with 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.2, and embedded in 2% agarose. Staining was performed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 50 min and with 1% uranyl acetate/1% phosphotungstic acid for 1 h. Dehydration of samples was done using graded acetone series. Specimens were embedded in Spurr epoxy resin and incubated for polymerization at 65 °C for 24 h. Sections were inspected with a TEM (H-7650, Hitachi, Japan).BODIPY stainingLipid droplets were stained with BODIPY 558/568 C12 (Thermo Fisher). After HK-2 cells were treated for 48 h by zoledronate, they were incubated with the dye at a final concentration of 20 μg/ml in PBS for 45 min at 37 °C, and rinsed to remove excess stain followed by a further incubation of 1 h at 37 °C in cell culture medium. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 30 min. Fixed cells were washed with PBS before mounting on slides using Citifluor antifadent solutions (Citifluor Ltd, United Kingdom). Samples were analyzed using a BX63 fluorescence microscope.Triglyceride (TG) measurementAll samples were measured using quantification kits (Jiancheng Bioengineering, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and then absorbance was determined by EnVision Microplate reader (Molecular Devices SpectraMax M5, PerkinElmer, USA).Palmitic oxidation and palmitate uptake assayPalmitic oxidation was performed according to Chen’s protocol (Chen et al. 2014). Briefly, HK-2 cells, followed by zoledronate (0, 50 μM), were incubated in the reaction medium (the same as Chen’s protocol). Reactions performed in a sealed flask were allowed to proceed for 30 min in a shaking water bath at 37 °C; 1 ml 3 M perchloric acid was added in the reaction medium to precipitate protein and nonmetabolized palmitate, and then incubated at room temperature for 2 h for collection of 14CO2 into a suspended well containing 500 μl of ethanolamine. Radioactivity was counted by a liquid scintillation counter (MicroBeta2, Perkin Elmer).Palmitate uptake assay was similar to the aforementioned palmitate oxidation assay with the following changes (Pillon et al. 2015). HK-2 cells were cultured with [14C]-palmitate-containing medium for 1 h, washed three times with PBS, and then were trypsinized and transferred into glass tubes containing 3 ml methanol-chloroform (2:1), and the lipids were extracted by adding 1 ml of chloroform and 1 ml of NaCl (1 M). The lower layer was transferred into a glass tube, dried with nitrogen and redissolved with chloroform. Radioactivity was quantified by a liquid scintillation counter.Intracellular ROS accumulation detectionThe ROS production in different samples was determined by 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) (YEASEN, Shanghai, China). Briefly, HK-2 cells were seeded in the 6-well plates at 2 × 105 cells/well and pretreated with 0, 1, 10 and 50 µM zoledronate at 37 °C for 6 h, and then 500 µl DCFH-DA (10 µM final concentration) was added to each well incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After washing three times with PBS, cells were harvested by cell scrapers and resuspended in PBS, were analyzed immediately using flow cytometry (Ex = 488 nm, Em = 525 nm).Membrane and cytoplasmic fractions, Rho and Rac activation assaysFor extracting membrane and cytosol proteins from the cell lysate Mem-PER plus membrane protein Extraction reagent kit was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (89842). RhoA and Rac1 activation were assessed using commercially available kits from Cytoskeleton (Denver, CO USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with modifications. HK-2 cells were harvested using provided lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors. To detect active RhoA, equal volumes of clarified lysates were incubated with Rho-GTP binding domain of the Rhotekin protein bound to GST beads. To detect active Rac1, lysates were incubated with Rac/Cdc42 binding domain of p21-activated kinase protein bound to GST beads for 1 h at 4 °C. Active GTP-Rho, GTP-Rac, and whole cell lysates were subjected to electrophoresis on 12% acrylamide gels and analyzed via western blot techniques.F-actin stainingTo determine the effect of zoledronate on cell cytoskeletal organization, we utilized the phalloidin immunofluorescence staining method. HK-2 cells were cultured on glass coverslips. After washing with PBS, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. Then the samples were incubated with FITC-phalloidin (40735ES75) in PBS for 30 min. Subsequently, the samples were counterstained with DAPI for 10 min. The images of samples coverslips were examined with BX63 fluorescence microscopy (Olympus, Japan).Generation of Slc27a2 −/− miceThe Slc27a2 −/− mice model was generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology and was maintained on the C57BL/6J background. The candidate chimeric sgRNA targeting exon1 of Slc27a2 (Gene ID: 26458) was designed based on http://crispr.mit.edu/. The sequence of the 20 nucleotide guide RNA used was GCGGGCGCTGCACGATCAACTGG (Underlined part is the PAM motif), and a pair of oligonucleotides for the target sequence was: forward primer 5′-TAGGCGGGCGCTGCACGATCAAC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-AAACGTTGATCGTGCAGCGCCCG-3′. In order to obtain gRNA and hCas9 mRNA, in vitro transcription reactions were respectively performed using the MEGAshortscript kit (Ambion, Am1354, USA) and mMESSAGE mMACHINE® T7 Ultra Kit (Ambion, Am1345) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Fu et al. 2016). And then, both the sgRNA and the Cas9 mRNA were purified using the MEGAclear kit (Ambion, AM1908) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sgRNA (30 ng/μl) was mixed with Cas9 mRNA (60 ng/μl), and the mixture was microinjected into the cytoplasm of the one-cell stage embryos. The embryos injected with RNAs were cultured in the M16 medium until the blastocyst stage, and then, approximately 15–25 blastocysts were implanted in pseudo-pregnant female mice. Genomic DNA was extracted from the tail tips of the newborn pups digested by proteinase K. The genomic sequences around the gRNA target sites were PCR amplified using the following primers: forward primer 5′-CTCCAAGATGTGCGGTACTT-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GCAGAGACTTGGCACGAATG-3′. The PCR products were purified using TIANquick Midi Purification Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) and sequenced directly. Over the ten generations of breeding, Slc27a2 −/− mice can be used for experiments.Animal experimentsThe wild type C57BL/6 J mice (8 weeks old) were supplied by laboratory animal research center of Tsinghua University (Beijing, China). The male wild type and Slc27a2 −/− mice were housed in an animal care facility at Tsinghua University, under controlled conditions of temperature (22 ± 2 °C) and relative humidity (50 ± 20%) with a 12 h light/dark cycle with water and food freely available. The mice were randomly allocated to the vehicle (0.9% saline)–treated (control, n = 5), zoledronate (3 mg/kg/week)–treated (Zole, n = 5) and zoledronate (3 mg/kg/week)/fenofibrate (20 mg/kg) co-treated (Zole + fenofibrate, n = 5) groups. And the Slc27a2 −/− mice were randomly allocated to the vehicle (0.9% saline)–treated (control, n = 5) and zoledronate (3 mg/kg/week)–treated (Zole, n = 5) groups. 1 day before the zoledronate injection, the Pparα agonist fenofibrate (20 mg/kg for 3 days) was administered by oral gavage, and all animals were injected zoledronate via the tail vein each week and treated for 4 weeks.Following final treatment and collection of urine, kidney tissues were harvested and cut in cross section. Part was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for morphological examination and the others kidney was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tsinghua University. All animal experiments were repeated three times independently.Biochemical markers of urineAfter 2 or 4 weeks treatment, mice were maintained under fasting condition for 12 h and urine was collected using a metabolic cage that was placed over an ice bath to avoid degradation of metabolites. Urine samples were immediately centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. And then the supernatant were immediately stored at −80 °C for subsequent analysis. For clinical chemistry measurements, the supernatant were analyzed for creatinine using a fully automatic biochemical analyzer (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan).Determination of TGFβ1 concentration in culture supernatant and serumThe TGFβ1 concentration of HK-2 cells culture supernatant or mice serum was measured by specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This assay has <1% cross-reactivity for TGFβ2, TGFβ3 and TGFβ5.RNA extraction and qPCR analysisTotal RNAs were prepared from cells or kidney tissues by using ultra-pure TRIzol reagent (Tiangen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed on equal amounts of total RNA (2.5 μg) by using random hexanucleotide primers to produce a cDNA library for each sample. qPCR were run in the ABI ViiA™7 Real-Time System (Life Technologies) by using SYBR Green Master Mix (Transgen, Beijing, China) and gene-specific primers (Table S1 online). Each sample was run in triplicate, and the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method was used to quantify fold increase (2−ΔΔCt ) compared with lean controls.Western blotCells or kidney tissue were washed with PBS (only cells) sonicated in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) with PMSF (Beyotime), and centrifuged at 14,000×g for 10 min. The 2X sample loading buffer was added to the protein sample and heated at 100 °C for 10 min. The proteins were separated by electrophoresis in 10% gels, and then transferred onto PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore, Germany) with 350 mA, blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 1 h, and incubated with antibody overnight at 4 °C. Protein expression was detected using a chemiluminescent staining reagent kit to visualize the signals.H&E staining, ORO staining, PAS staining and Masson’s stainingParaffin sections (5 μm) (Harada et al. 2016) stained with H&E, PAS and Masson’s trichrome, and frozen sections (6 μm) were used for ORO staining to determine the lipid accumulation. All stained sections were examined under a light microscope (Olympus,), and finally evaluated for injury by an experienced pathologist who was blinded to the treatment each animal had received.Immunohistochemical (IHC) stainingKidney tissue sections (5 μm) (Harada et al. 2016) were deparaffinized in xylene, using graded ethanol, and rinsed with distilled water. For antigen retrieval, the sections were incubated with citrate buffer solution (pH: 6.0, 100 °C). After blocking by using 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min, the sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit primary antibody Fn1, collagen I, α-SMA and Slc27a2. The secondary antibody was added and the sections were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. An Olympus microscope was used for image analysis.ChIP-SeqSmad2/3 ChIP-Seq data were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE53233) and aligned to mouse genome (mm10) by using Bowtie1.1.2. Both peak calling and generation of ChIP-Seq visual files were implemented by using MACS1.4.2. Gene tracks of ChIP-Seq data are the snapshots of bedgraph files visualized in IGV.Statistical analysisStatistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software, version 6.0. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean. Unpaired t tests were performed for comparison between two groups. Data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test. Statistical significances were calculated and indicated.ResultsProteomic profiles of HK-2 cells treated with zoledronate revealed dysregulated TGFβ signaling and FA metabolismTo determine the cytotoxic range for zoledronate in HK-2 cells, the MTT assay showed that 50 µM zoledronate treatment for 48 h resulted in the cell viability at around 50% (Fig. 1a). Apoptotic rate, pro-apoptotic and kidney injury marker genes were significantly elevated with increasing doses of zoledronate treatments (Fig. S1a, b online). Based on the information above, 50 μM zoledronate and 48 h were used as the maximal treatment conditions to investigate the effects of zoledronate on the cytotoxicity of HK-2 cells in the subsequent experiments. Open image in new window Fig. 1 Analysis of proteomic data of HK-2 cells treated with or without zoledronate (50 µM) for 48 h. a Cell viability curves of HK-2 cell. HK-2 cell was treated by various doses of zoledronate (0, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 50 µM) for 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h. b Heat map of significantly changed proteins following zoledronate treatment on HK-2 cells. c Gene ontology (GO) analysis of HK-2 cell treated with control and zoledronate samples. The graph shows the negative log p values for the enrichment of the specific pathways. d Relative protein levels related to TGFβ and inflammation. e Relative protein levels related to fibrosis and kidney injury. f Relative protein levels related to lipid and FA metabolism. Data presented as mean ± SD (each treated sample (n = 2) were compared with each untreated one (n = 2) once, resulting in four sets of data). Zole is the abbreviation of zoledronate in all the figures Initially, to identify the cellular and molecular pathways underlying zoledronate-induced nephrotoxicity, we applied proteomic profiling with HK-2 cells with or without 50 μM zoledronate treatment. A total of 5197 proteins were identified by LC–MS/MS, among which, 280 proteins were identified as significantly altered as defined by a corrected p value of 0.05 and at least 50% of up-regulation and 25% of down-regulation of their expression in 50 μM zoledronate-treated samples as compared with the untreated (Table S2 online). Down-regulated proteins were relatively less than up-regulated, so that a smaller percentage alternation was considered arbitrarily. The quantitative ratios between zoledronate and control groups are in a heat map (Fig. 1b).GO analysis identified specific changes in lipid and FA metabolism, as well as inflammation and bioenergenesis metabolism (Figs. 1c, S2 online). Of particular interest, TGFβ and inflammation-related proteins [13 proteins such as transforming growth factor beta 1 induced transcript 1 (TGFβ1I1), transforming growth factor beta receptor associated protein 1 (TGFβRAP1), CD55, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), syndecan 4 (SDC4), strawberry notch homolog 2 (SBNO2) et al.] (Mizejewski 2015; Kim et al. 2004; van Beek et al. 2005; Karkampouna et al. 2016; González-Guerrero et al. 2017) were up-regulated with a mean ratio >1.5 (Fig. 1d). TGFβ and inflammation play critical roles in fibrosis development and acute kidney injury (Bottinger and Bitzer 2002). Consistent with elevated TGFβ-related proteins, the proteins associated with fibrosis and kidney injury (Kang et al. 2015; Sanchez-Nino et al. 2015) [TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor-1 (TIMP1), -2 (TIMP2), cystatin C (CST3) and albumin (ALB)] (Kang et al. 2015; Mizejewski 2015) were increased significantly with zoledronate treatment (Fig. 1e). Proteins involved in FA and lipid transport including OLR1 (3.4-fold) and SLC27A2 (1.9-fold) were significantly elevated whereas proteins involved in FAO were decreased compared with those in controls (Fig. 1f). These analyses suggest that the zoledronate treatment may dysregulate TGFβ signaling and FA metabolism.Zoledronate activated the TGFβ/Smad cascade to induce fibrotic signalingProteomic data identified that the TGFβ-related signaling was up-regulated in HK-2 cells after zoledronate treatment, and TGFβ is the most powerful cytokine in kidney fibrosis development and kidney injury (Bottinger and Bitzer 2002). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) results demonstrated that TGFβ1 expression was about 2.4-fold (10 μM) and 3.0-fold (50 μM) higher in zoledronate-treated HK-2 cells than those in the controls, indicating that TGFβ1 production was stimulated by zoledronate treatment (Fig. 2a). Therefore, TGFβ1-associated downstream genes of Smad3 and fibrotic factors were examined. Immunoblot analysis confirmed up-regulation of TGFβ1 and p-Smad3, as well as three fibrosis factors, collagen I, FN1 and α-SMA, after zoledronate treatment (Fig. 2b). Next, the effect of zoledronate, TGFβ1 and SB431542 (an inhibitor of TGFβ receptor 1), was examined on regulating the genes above. Inhibition of TGFβ receptor 1 significantly suppressed zoledronate-induced expression of p-Smad3 and fibrotic markers (Fig. 2c). On the other hand, qPCR results also confirmed that zoledronate induced over-expressions of some of key fibrosis factors such as vimentin (VIM), collagen type I alpha 1 chain (COL1A1) (only at 50 μM zoledronate), FN1, TIMP1, TIMP2 (only at 50 μM zoledronate) (Fig. 2d). These results supported a TGFβ1/Smad3 cascade of signaling events triggered by zoledronate treatments for kidney fibroblast activation. In order to further validate the induction of TGFβ1 by zoledronate treatment, human embryonic kidney 293T cell line HEK 293T (Fig. S3a online) and rat renal tubular cell line NRK-52E (Fig. S3b online) were used for zoledronate treatments. TGFβ1 and down-stream targets, p-SMAD3 and collagen I, were regulated similarly to HK-2 cells, suggesting that activation of TGFβ1 signaling might be conserved in these renal cells. As a potent multifunctional cytokine, TGFβ shows both anti- and pro-inflammatory roles in different situations (Sanjabi et al. 2009). The expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine markers IL1B (3.8-fold), IL6 (6.8-fold) and TNFα (2.0-fold) were significantly increased (Fig. S3c) compared to the untreated ones, indicating that zoledronate resulted in the inflammation of the renal cells. Zoledronate-induced TGFβ over expression may play a pro-inflammatory role here. Reports have been shown that zoledronate increases the inflammatory response of kidney, macrophage and prostate cancer cells (Lin et al. 2014; Muratsu et al. 2013; Toussaint et al. 2009). These data suggest zoledronate may induce renal fibrosis and injury by triggering TGFβ/Smad3 dependent signaling pathways. Open image in new window Fig. 2 Effects of zoledronate treatments on TGFβ1 in HK-2 cells. a TGFβ1 mRNA expression in HK-2 cells under various concentrations of zoledronate treatments. b Western blot analysis of TGFβ1/SMAD3 signaling and fibrosis markers in the HK-2 cells after zoledronate treatments. c Comparisons of zoledronate treatment with TGFβ1 receptor agonist (TGFβ) or inhibitor (SB431542) on p-Smad3 and fibrotic factor protein expressions. d Induction of relative mRNA levels of genes related to kidney fibrosis by zoledronate treatments. All data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6) and * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 compared to control, respectively Zoledronate caused intracellular lipid accumulation due to dysregulated FA uptake and oxidationTo further explore metabolic alternations in FA metabolism that occur with zoledronate exposure, metabolomics was used to identify metabolites that were altered in HK-2 cells following zoledronate treatment (50 μM) (Table S3 online). The top significantly altered metabolic pathways included lipid and FA metabolism, glucose metabolism and TCA cycle (Fig. 3a). Among the significantly changed metabolites, the amounts of carnitine, betaine and taurine,which are important on FAO (Fritz and Yue 1963; Ibrahim et al. 2003), were significant lower; however, FAO intermediates, such as myristoylcarnitine, l-palmitoylcarnitine, N-palmitoyl taurine and hexanoylcarnitine were significantly higher in the 50 μM zoledronate treatment group than those of controls (Fig. 3b). Meanwhile, 50 μM zoledronate treatment resulted in significant increase of intracellular lipids, including sphinganine, phytosphingosine, stearic acid, oleic acid and palmitic acid (Fig. 3c). These findings indicate zoledronate treatment in HK-2 cells may disrupt FA metabolism. Open image in new window Fig. 3 Zoledronate treatments resulting in lipid accumulation in HK-2 cells. a Pathway analysis of metabolomic data revealed FA metabolism as the major pathway affected in HK-2 cells treated with or without 50 µM zoledronate. b, c Elevations of metabolites of FAO carrier, conjugated FA intermediates, FAs and lipid species in 50 µM zoledronate-treated HK-2 cells as compared with the control group in metabolomic data. d, e Representative TEM (scale bar 2 μm) and BODIPY staining (scale bar 20 μm) showed lipid drop formation in 50 µM zoledronate-treated HK-2 cells. f TG quantifications in the samples of HK-2 cells with or without 50 µM zoledronate. g, h Relative mRNA or protein levels of genes related to FAO in the samples of HK-2 cell treated with zoledronate at doses of 0, 1, 10, 50 µM for 48 h. i Ability of FAO was reduced by zoledronate treatment using [14C]palmitate oxidation assay. j, k Relative mRNA and protein levels of genes relative to FA transport in the samples of HK-2 cell treated with zoledronate at doses of 0, 1, 10, 50 µM for 48 h. l Increased ability of FA uptake induced by zoledronate treatment using [14C]palmitate uptake assay We next examined zoledronate’s effect on cellular lipid status using TEM and BODIPY staining for neutral lipids (Fig. 3d, e). Both analyses revealed higher cellular lipid content after zoledronate treatments, as indicated by lipid accumulation in droplets in TEM images (Fig. 3d) and elevated BODIPY labeling in zoledronate-treated cells (Fig. 3e). Further, triglyceride content was significantly increased 37.3% after 50 μM zoledronate treatment compared with controls (Fig. 3f). This, in conjunction with the metabolomics analyses, is compelling evidence that zoledronate treatment induces improper FA accumulation and may be an important component of zoledronate-induced nephrotoxicity.In order to explore the molecular pathways related to zoledronate-induced lipid accumulation, the mRNA levels of key enzymes responsible for FAO were checked (Fig. 3g) (Kang et al. 2015). PPARA and PPARGC1A are key transcriptional regulators responsible for regulating the enzymes involved in FAO, such as acyl-CoA oxidase (ACOX1), carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 alpha (CPT1A) and -2 (CPT2) (Kang et al. 2015). mRNA levels of PPARA was reduced by about 22.2, 60.7 and 79.9% of that of controls at 1, 10 and 50 μM zoledronate treatments, respectively; PPARGC1A was reduced by about 90.0% of that of controls at both 10 μM and 50 μM zoledronate treatments (Fig. 3g). CPT1A was significantly reduced by about 43.8, 62.7 and 67.4% relative to the controls at 1, 10 and 50 μM zoledronate treatments, respectively; ACOX1 was significantly decreased by about 42.5 and 50.3% relative to the controls at 10 and 50 μM zoledronate treatments, respectively (Fig. 3g). However, zoledronate did not affect the mRNA expression of CPT2 whereas ACOX2 was not detected (Fig. 3g). Consistent with gene expression analysis, immunoblot analysis for protein expression of revealed the deceases in PPARA, PPARGC1A, ACOX1 and CPT1A after zoledronate treatments (Fig. 3h). These results suggested that zoledronate may inhibit FAO by down-regulating PPARA and PPARGC1A, thereby suppressing CPT1A and ACOX1.To check the FAO rate following zoledronate treatment, palmitate oxidation assay was conducted to evaluate FAO activity (Fig. 3i) (Kim et al. 2004). After 50 μM zoledronate treatment, the palmitate oxidation rate significantly decreased to 73.5% of that of controls. Next, the expression of FA transporters was investigated, followed by proteomic analysis (Fig. 1f). After 48 h zoledronate exposure, mRNA levels of SLC27A2 were about 6.9-fold higher in 50 μM zoledronate treatment group than controls, but there were no significant changes in the mRNA levels of CD36 and other SLC27 family members following zoledronate treatments (Fig. 3j). Protein level of SLC27A2 was also increased at 50 μM of zoledronate treatment whereas CD36 appeared unchanged (Fig. 3k).Increased expression of FA transporter SLC27A2 indicates FA uptake may be increased following zoledronate treatment. To evaluate FA uptake, we applied radioisotope labeled [14C] palmitate uptake assay (Chen et al. 2014; Pillon et al. 2015). Palmitate uptake was significantly increased about 17.2% after zoledronate treatment compared with control treatment (Fig. 3l). SLC27A2 plays a key role in FA uptake and biosynthesis serving as a long-chain FAs transporter that is mainly expressed in kidney and liver cells (Anderson and Stahl 2013). Collectively, our data indicate up-regulation of SLC27A2, along with impaired FAO, contributes to lipid accumulation following zoledronate exposure in HK-2 cells.Zoledronate treatment induced renal fibrotic injury and lipid accumulation in miceWe next examined the cellular and molecular underpinnings of zoledronate-induced renal toxicity in mice. Following 4-week treatments with zoledronate in which mice received the drug once weekly, urine creatinine was significantly decreased more than 50.0% in mice treated with zoledronate compared with vehicle treatment indicating impaired kidney function (Fig. 4a). Creatinine was not affected after 2-week treatments in mice (Fig. S4a online) thus we used the 4-week treatment regime for pathology and molecular analyses of zoledronate-induced nephrotoxicity. H&E and PAS staining revealed substantial morphological changes in renal tubules including tubular atrophy, loss of brush border and inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig. 4b). The ORO staining was elevated in zoledronate-treated animals pointing to enhance neutral lipid accumulation with zoledronate exposure (Fig. 4b). There was clear evidence of kidney fibrosis in zoledronate-treated animals, demonstrated by increased interstitial Masson’s trichrome staining, collagen I, Fn1 and α-SMA immunolabeling in the kidney cortex (Fig. 4c). These data demonstrated zoledronate-treatment in an animal model induces kidney fibrosis and FA accumulation, both of which are major contributors to kidney pathology. We next tested if pro-fibrotic pathway TGFβ1 and pro-apoptotic pathways, both identified in our HK-2 cell model, were altered in the kidney of zoledronate-treated animals. Kidney expression of TGFβ1 protein and p-Smad3 were elevated as were levels of fibrotic proteins collagen I, Fn1 and α-SMA following zoledronate treatment (Fig. 4d). To further examine the effect of zoledronate treatment on the TGFβ production, we measured the TGFβ amount in the supernatant or serum of treated or untreated HK-2 cells and animals, respectively. It showed significantly increased production of TGFβ in supernatants of zoledronate-treated cells (Fig. S4b) but not in the serum of zoledronate-treated mice (Fig. S4c), implying that zoledronate might cause TGFβ over-production in the local renal tissue but not the whole-body level. Many fibrosis genes were significantly elevated in the kidney following zoledronate treatment, including Vim, Col1a1, Col3a1, Col4a1, Fn1, Timp1 and Timp2 but not Acta2 (Fig. 4e). mRNA levels of pro-apoptotic factor Apaf-1 (3.6-fold up), Bax (3.2-fold up) and pro-survival factor Bcl2 (0.4-fold down) were regulated reciprocally and Kim-1 was significantly increased by more than 4.1-fold after zoledronate treatments compared to the controls, which indicated that the tubular injury induced by zoledronate caused enhanced cell apoptosis (Fig. 4f). These data point to kidney fibrosis and apoptotic cell death as part of zoledronate-induced nephrotoxicity. Open image in new window Fig. 4 Effects of renal toxicity of zoledronate treatment in mice and its relative molecular pathways. a Reduced creatinine secretion in zoledronate-treated mice as compared with the control group. b Representative images of zoledronate untreated and treated mouse kidney sections stained with H&E, PAS and ORO staining (scale bar 1 mm). c Representative pictures of Masson’s trichrome staining (scale bar 50 μm) and collagen I, Fn1 and α-SMA IHC (scale bar 20 μm) for detection of zoledronate-induced kidney injury. d Western blot analysis of TGFβ1/Smad3 pathway and fibrosis markers in the kidney of controlled and zoledronate-treated mice. e Relative transcript levels of fibrosis and kidney-injury-related genes in controls and zoledronate-treated mice. f Relative mRNA levels of typical apoptosis and kidney injury factors. g Relative mRNA levels of FAO-related genes in controls and zoledronate-treated ones. h Relative transcript levels of FA uptake-related transporter or carrier in controls and zoledronate-treated ones. i Representative IHC images and western blot analysis of mouse kidney from control and zoledronate-treated mice for Slc27a2. (scale bar 20 μm). Each group had five mice and was treated for 4 weeks in the animal studies We next analyzed the molecular pathways underlying zoledronate-induced lipid accumulation. FAO-relevant genes [except enoyl-CoA hydratase 3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase (Ehhadh), carnitine O-acetyltransferase (Crat) and solute carrier family 25 member 20 (Slc25a20)] were significantly reduced in mouse renal tissue following zoledronate treatment (Fig. 4g) (Kang et al. 2015; Li et al. 2008; Polinati et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2016), pointing to defects in FAO in mouse kidney by zoledronate administration. Long-chain FAs are the main energy source for renal tubular epithelial cells (Kang et al. 2015), which enter the cells mostly through several membrane proteins, including FA carrier CD36 and FA transport proteins (Verhulst et al. 2015). Similar to our observations in HK-2 cells, Slc27a2 was the only highly expressed FA transport protein in mouse kidney and zoledronate induced about 0.4-fold higher expression of Slc27a2, but did not affect Cd36 (Fig. 4h, i). Similar to the cellular study HK-2 cells, zoledronate treatment also significantly increased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine markers Il1b (2.1-fold), Il6 (5.1-fold) and Tnfα (7.6-fold) as compared to the control group (Fig. S4d), which may be due to the fibrotic and lipotoxic effects of accumulation of fatty acid. These data point to disruption in FAO and transport as a major cause of lipid accumulation in zoledronate-treated animals. Slc27a2 deficiency reversed the renal lipid accumulation and markedly reduced the renal toxicity induced by zoledronate treatmentExperiments in both HK-2 cells and mice demonstrated zoledronate treatment increases expression of FA transporter SLC27A2. SLC27A2 is unique amongst FA transport proteins as it functions as both a FA transporter and acyl-CoA synthetase that is important for FA synthesis and degradation, and expressed highly in kidney and liver (Anderson and Stahl 2013). We tested the hypothesis that reducing FA uptake mediated by Slc27a2 could improve zoledronate-induced renal toxicity. Slc27a2 knockout (KO) mouse (Slc27a2 −/−) was generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system (Fig. S5 online). Slc27a2 −/− exposed to zoledronate did not display as severe signs of nephrotoxicity as wild type (WT) mice, as demonstrated by better kidney morphology (Fig. 5a) and no significant creatinine reduction (Fig. S6a online). Lipid accumulation, as indicated by ORO staining, was notably less in zoledronate-treated Slc27a2 −/− mice as compared to zoledronate-treated WTs (Fig. 5b). Masson’s trichrome staining, collagen I, Fn1 and α-SMA IHC showed that kidney fibrosis severity was markedly reduced in zoledronate-treated Slc27a2 −/− mice as compared with zoledronate-treated WT mice (Fig. 5c–f). To quantitatively measure the fibrosis damage, the positive areas of Masson’s staining were quantified and the fibrotic damage from zoledronate-treated Slc27a2 ablated mice was about 72.8% of the zoledronate-treated WT mice, indicating that Slc27a2 deficiency greatly reduced the zoledronate-induced nephrotoxicity (Fig. S6c). Consistent with our histological analysis, immunoblot and qPCR experiments for fibrosis markers including Fn1, collagen I and α-SMA were significantly lower or returned to basal levels in Slc27a2-deficient mice as compared to WT after zoledronate treatment (Fig. 5g). Vim, Col4a1, Timp1 and Timp2 were not significantly increased in zoledronate-treated Slc27a2 −/− mice, while transcript levels of fibrotic factors Col1a1, Col3a1 and Fn1 were significantly decreased between zoledronate-treated Slc27a2 −/− mice and zoledronate-treated WT mice (Fig. 5h). The pro-inflammatory cytokine markers, Il6 and Tnfα, had no significant alternation in zoledronate-treated Slc27a2 −/− mouse kidneys as compared with the untreated ones except for a 2.1-fold increase of Il1b (Fig. S6b), suggesting that deficiency of Slc27a2 in mouse kidney greatly protected the mice from zoledronate-induced injury. Furthermore, Slc27a2 ablation prevented zoledronate-induced decrease in FAO regulators Pparα and Ppargc1α and their downstream genes (Fig. 5i). Open image in new window Fig. 5 Effects of renal toxicity of zoledronate in Slc27a2 ablated mice and its relative molecular pathways. a–f Representative photomicrographs of the H&E staining (scale bar 1 mm), ORO staining (scale bar 1 mm), Masson’s trichrome staining (scale bar 50 μm) and IHC images (scale bar 20 μm) of fibrosis markers of Fn1, collagen I and α-SMA from kidney sections in untreated WT and Slc27a2 −/− mice as well as zoledronate-treated WT and Slc27a2 −/− ones. g Immunoblotting of fibrosis markers of Fn1, collagen I and α-SMA in the mice above. h Relative mRNA levels of genes related to kidney fibrosis and injury from the samples above. i Relative transcript levels of FAO-related genes in untreated and zoledronate-treated WT and Slc27a2 −/− mice. j Tracks of Smad2/3 ChIPseq in Slc27a2 gene locus in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and mESC-derived endoderm cells. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 (zoledronate-treated vs untreated Slc27a2 −/− mice); & P < 0.05 (zoledronate-treated Slc27a2 −/− mice vs treated WT ones) We next checked if elevated TGFβ signaling following zoledronate treatment could underlie increased expression of Slc27a2. We identified a SMAD3 peak in the promoter region of Slc27a2 gene (Fig. 5j) (Yoon et al. 2015). Tracks of Smad2/3 ChIP-seq are shown in Slc27a2 gene locus in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and mESC-derived endoderm cells. Slc27a2 proximate promoter region indicates significant Smad2/3 occupancy both in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and mESC-derived endoderm cells. These results indicate that TGFβ1 may potentially regulate Slc27a2 transcript levels directly through elevated TGFβ-SMAD2/3 signaling. Collectively, this is compelling data that elevated Slc27a2 expression is a major contributor to lipid accumulation and kidney fibrosis following zoledronate treatment.PPAR agonist fenofibrate ameliorated zoledronate-associated renal toxicityOur studies in HK-2 cells and mice indicate that, following zoledronate treatment, elevated FA uptake via Slc27a2 may function in concert with impaired FAO to induce lipid accumulation. Thus we tested if pharmacological activation of the FAO regulator PPARA could ameliorate zoledronate-induced renal toxicity. Co-administration of fenofibrate, a PPARA agonist, with zoledronate decreased histological evidence of renal injury and lipid accumulation as compared with mice treated with zoledronate alone (Fig. 6a). Diminished fibrosis development and reduced fibrotic marker expressions were observed by Masson’s trichrome staining, collagen I, Fn1 and α-SMA IHC in fenofibrate and zoledronate co-administered group compared with those in the zoledronate alone group (Fig. 6b). Western blots confirmed co-treatment of fenofibrate and zoledronate resulted in lower expression of fibrotic markers (collagen I, Fn1 and α-SMA) in zoledronate and fenofibrate co-administration group as compared to zoledronate treatment alone (Fig. 6c). Fibrotic markers co-treatment treatment group were significantly lower (Col1a1 and Col3a1) as compared to zoledronate however certain fibrotic genes (Col4a1, Timp1 and Timp2) (Fig. 6d). FAO relevant genes (Pparα, Ppargc1α, Cpt1α and Acox1) were significantly increased after fenofibrate and zoledronate co-administration (Fig. 6e). These results indicate that restoring PPARA activity can partially alleviate the development of renal fibrosis by zoledronate. Open image in new window Fig. 6 Effect of PPARA agonist fenobrinate on zoledronate-associated nephrotoxicity. a Representative images of H&E and ORO staining of kidney sections from control mice, zoledronate-treated mice and zoledronate-treated mice with fenofibrate (Zole + fenofibrate). (scale bar 1 mm). b Masson’s trichrome staining (scale bar: 50 μm) and fibrosis markers of Fn1, collagen I and α-SMA IHC (scale bar 20 μm) from kidney sections in control, zoledronate- and zoledronate + fenofibrate-treated mice. c Western blot analysis of kidney fibrosis markers in three groups of mice above. d Relative mRNA levels of genes related to kidney fibrosis from the samples above. e Relative transcript levels of FAO-related genes in the mice above. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, compared between zoledronate-treated or zoledronate + fenofibrate co-treated mice DiscussionIn this study, we systematically investigated the molecular mechanism of zoledronate-induced kidney toxicity with human kidney tubular cell HK-2 and mouse models. Here we present activated TGFβ signaling triggering multiple dysregulated pathways in zoledronate-induced nephrotoxicity, including TGFβ/smad3 mediated profibrotic processes and abnormal FA metabolism. Our studies indicate that activated TGFβ signaling could be a major part of zoledronate-induced pathology in our cell and animal models. TGFβ is a well-established “master modulator” of profibrotic cytokine in fibrosis development of multiple tissues (Manickam et al. 2014; Zhan and Kanwar 2014). Our results from HK-2 cells and mouse kidney indicate zoledronate may elevate TGFβ signaling by increasing TGFβ1 protein expression. It may serve as a direct activator of TGFβ signaling in renal tubular cells and is a key mechanism contributing to zoledronate-induced kidney toxicity.Along with increased TGFβ and renal fibrosis, we observed significant lipid accumulation in zoledronate-treated HK-2 cells and mice. Lipid accumulation in tubular epithelial cells has drawn increasing attention in acute, fibrotic and diabetic kidney diseases (Herman-Edelstein et al. 2014; Kang et al. 2015; Susztak et al. 2005). Excess deposition of triglyceride results in cellular lipotoxicity and promotes kidney fibrosis and injury (Kang et al. 2015). However, research into lipid metabolism in the kidney has been limited, and it is not clear if lipid accumulation is a cause or consequence of cellular toxicity. The lipid accumulation observed in both HK-2 and mouse kidney with zoledronate treatments may be downstream of zoledronate induced TGFβ signaling activation. TGFβ suppresses the PPARA’s expression in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with kidney fibrosis (Kang et al. 2015) and our in vitro and in vivo studies showed that PPARA or PPARGC1A was down-regulated by zoledronate treatments. Therefore, it is conceivable that down-regulation of PPARA or PPARGC1A and its target genes like CPTs and ACOXs following zoledronate treatment may inhibit the normal FAO in renal tubular cells and cause lipid accumulation. In support of this, we show that co-treatment with PPARA agonist fenofibrate partially ameliorated the effects of zoledronate-treatment on kidney fibrosis and lipid accumulation. Complementarily, a recent study showed that zoledronate decreased estrogen-related receptor α activity to down-regulate the activities of PPARA or PPARGC1A (Wei et al. 2016). Altogether, these evidences indicate that zoledronate has a negative regulation on FAO.A parallelled mechanism for FA accumulation is increased expression of long chain FA transporter SLC27A2 following zoledronate-treatment. Importantly, our results indicate that SLC27A2 is the most highly expressed FA transporter in the kidney. Other studies point to CD36 as the main transporter and an important player in FA accumulation (Kang et al. 2015; Susztak et al. 2005). However, we found that CD36 gene expression was much lower than SLC27A2 and was not affected by zoledronate treatment. We provide compelling data using Slc27a2 deficient mice that upregulation of the transporter following zoledronate treatment plays a major role in zoledronate-induced lipid accumulation and kidney fibrosis. Elevated SLC27A2 expression has been associated with proximal tubular toxicity in calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (Maluf et al. 2014), suggesting its role in drug mediated renal toxicity might be broader. Evidence has shown that SLC27A2 is a transcriptional target of Smad3 (Yoon et al. 2015), raising the possibility that elevated SLC27A2 results from zoledronate-induced increase in TGFβ activity. Our findings of impaired FA metabolism with zoledronate treatment indicate that drugs that block FA uptake or enhance FAO might be therapeutically beneficial for patients on zoledronate regiment or with kidney fibrosis.Though our data support over-activation of TGFβ signaling as a major component of zoledronate-induced nephrotoxicity, our proteomic and metabolomic studies in zoledronate-treated HK-2 cells point to several potentially important pathways acting in parallel to and/or downstream of TGFβ signaling. The Rho family of GTPases, including CDC42 (2.7 ± 0.3 folds), RhoA (2.5 ± 0.3 folds) and Rac1 (1.8 ± 0.2 folds), were among the most elevated proteins identified in our proteomic data (Fig. S7a online). Furthermore, we identified increased Rho/Rac/CDC42 activity and actin stress fiber formation in zoledronate-treated HK-2 cells (Fig. S7b online). Zoledronate can inhibit protein prenelyation of small GTPases (Fig. S7c online) and this has been shown to cause accumulated cytosolic GTP-bound GTPase and sustained activation of downstream effector of RhoA, Rho kinase (Rock), NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4)-derived ROS and Cofilin in HK-2 cells (Fig. S7d, e online), macrophages and osteoclasts (Dunford et al. 2006). Consequently, the ROS production was increased after zoledronate treatments (Fig. S8a online) consistent with the significant reduction in antioxidants like GSH from metabolomics assay (Fig. S8b online). The effect of zoledronate on GTPase prenylation and activity has been proposed as the mechanism of zoledronate associated renal toxicity (Markowitz et al. 2003; Munier et al. 2005; Ott 2012; Papapetrou 2009; Perazella and Markowitz 2008). Our work indicates zoledronate-induced FA accumulation and kidney fibrosis are the major factors in zoledronate induced nephrotoxicity however this does not rule out an important role for defective protein prenylation and altered GTPase activity in zoledronate kidney toxicity. TGFβ/Smad signaling can also increase GTPase activity and this may also contribute to elevated Rho/Rac/CDC42 activity in zoledronate-treated HK-2 cells (Manickam et al. 2014; Tsou et al. 2014; Zhan and Kanwar 2014). Collectively, these results suggested zoledronate activated TGFβ mediated multiple signaling pathways to induce nephrotoxicity (Fig. 7). Open image in new window Fig. 7 Summary of model of action of zoledronate-induced renal toxicity In summary, our study shows that zoledronate activates TGFβ signaling in the kidney to mediate several cellular events leading to renal toxicity, foremost of which are fibrosis development and dysregulation of FA metabolism. Restoring PPARA signaling to improve FAO or blocking FA transporter SLC27A2 with zoledronate treatments by pharmacological or genetic means helped protect mice from renal toxicity.NotesAcknowledgementsThis work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81470839), Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (No. 20161080086), National 1000-Talent Program (No. 20141770980), Nation Science and Technology Major Projects for Major New Drugs Innovation and Develop (No. 2017ZX09101-005-004-002) and a starting fund from Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences.Compliance with ethical standardsConflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.Ethical standardsThe manuscript does not contain clinical studies or participant data.Supplementary material 204_2017_2048_MOESM1_ESM.docx (48 kb) Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 48 kb) 204_2017_2048_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (4.8 mb) Supplementary material 2 (PPTX 4931 kb) ReferencesAnderson CM, Stahl A (2013) SLC27 fatty acid transport proteins. Mol Asp Med 34(2–3):516–528. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.07.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarBergner R, Siegrist B, Gretz N, Pohlmeyer-Esch G, Kranzlin B (2015) Nephrotoxicity of ibandronate and zoledronate in Wistar rats with normal renal function and after unilateral nephrectomy. Pharmacol Res 99:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.04.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarBottinger EP, Bitzer M (2002) TGF-β signaling in renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 13(10):2600–2610. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000033611.79556.ae CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarChang JT, Green L, Beitz J (2003) Renal failure with the use of zoledronic acid. N Engl J Med 349(17):1676–1678CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarChen L, Shu Y, Liang X et al (2014) OCT1 is a high-capacity thiamine transporter that regulates hepatic steatosis and is a target of metformin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(27):9983–9988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314939111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarDunford JE, Rogers MJ, Ebetino FH, Phipps RJ, Coxon FP (2006) Inhibition of protein prenylation by bisphosphonates causes sustained activation of Rac, Cdc42, and Rho GTPases. J Bone Miner Res 21(5):684–694. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060118 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarFritz IB, Yue KTN (1963) Long-chain carnitine acyltransferase and role of acylcarnitine derivatives in catalytic increase of fatty acid oxidation induced by carnitine. J Lipid Res 4(3):279–287PubMedGoogle ScholarFu X, Zhang L, Jin Y et al (2016) Loss of Myh14 increases susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in CBA/CaJ mice. Neural Plast 2016:6720420. doi: 10.1155/2016/6720420 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarGonzález-Guerrero C, Cannata-Ortiz P, Guerri C et al (2017) TLR4-mediated inflammation is a key pathogenic event leading to kidney damage and fibrosis in cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Arch Toxicol 91(4):1925–1939. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1830-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarHarada Y, Tanaka N, Ichikawa M et al (2016) PPARα-dependent cholesterol/testosterone disruption in Leydig cells mediates 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-induced testicular toxicity in mice. Arch Toxicol 90(12):3061–3071. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1669-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarHerman-Edelstein M, Scherzer P, Tobar A, Levi M, Gafter U (2014) Altered renal lipid metabolism and renal lipid accumulation in human diabetic nephropathy. J Lipid Res 55(3):561–572. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P040501 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarIbrahim WH, Bailey N, Sunvold GD, Bruckner GG (2003) Effects of carnitine and taurine on fatty acid metabolism and lipid accumulation in the liver of cats during weight gain and weight loss. Am J Vet Res 64(10):1265–1277. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.1265 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarJennings P, Crean D, Aschauer L et al (2015) Interleukin-19 as a translational indicator of renal injury. Arch Toxicol 89(1):101–106. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1237-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarKang HM, Ahn SH, Choi P et al (2015) Defective fatty acid oxidation in renal tubular epithelial cells has a key role in kidney fibrosis development. Nat Med 21(1):37–46. doi: 10.1038/nm.3762 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarKarkampouna S, Goumans MJ, ten Dijke P, Dooley S, Julio MK (2016) Inhibition of TGFβ type I receptor activity facilitates liver regeneration upon acute CCl4 intoxication in mice. Arch Toxicol 90(2):347–357. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1436-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarKim JH, Ha IS, Hwang CI et al (2004) Gene expression profiling of anti-GBM glomerulonephritis model: the role of NF-κB in immune complex kidney disease. Kidney Int 66(5):1826–1837. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00956.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarLi S, Liu C, Li N et al (2008) Genome-wide coactivation analysis of PGC-1α identifies BAF60a as a regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism. Cell Metab 8(2):105–117. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.06.013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarLin YC, Liao PC, Tsai TF et al (2014) Zoledronic acid elicits proinflammatory cytokine profile in osteolytic prostate cancer cells. ISRN Pathol 2014:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2014/124746 CrossRefGoogle ScholarLiu H, Zhang H, Cui R et al (2016) Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α ameliorates perfluorododecanoic acid-induced production of reactive oxygen species in rat liver. Arch Toxicol 90(6):1383–1397. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1559-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarLuhe A, Kunkele KP, Haiker M et al (2008) Preclinical evidence for nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate inhibition of farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) synthase in the kidney: implications for renal safety. Toxicol In Vitro 22(4):899–909. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.01.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarMaluf DG, Dumur CI, Suh JL et al (2014) Evaluation of molecular profiles in calcineurin inhibitor toxicity post-kidney transplant: input to chronic allograft dysfunction. Am J Transpl 14(5):1152–1163. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12696 CrossRefGoogle ScholarManickam N, Patel M, Griendling KK, Gorin Y, Barnes JL (2014) RhoA/Rho kinase mediates TGF-β1-induced kidney myofibroblast activation through Poldip2/Nox4-derived reactive oxygen species. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 307(2):F159–F171. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00546.2013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarMarkowitz GS, Fine PL, Stack JI et al (2003) Toxic acute tubular necrosis following treatment with zoledronate (Zometa). Kidney Int 64(1):281–289. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00071.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarMcKay RR, Lin X, Perkins JJ, Heng DY, Simantov R, Choueiri TK (2014) Prognostic significance of bone metastases and bisphosphonate therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 66(3):502–509. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.040 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarMizejewski GJ (2015) Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and inflammation: is AFP an acute and/or chronic phase reactant? J Hematol Thromb Dis. doi: 10.4172/2329-8790.1000191 Google ScholarMunier A, Gras V, Andrejak M et al (2005) Zoledronic acid and renal toxicity: data from French adverse effect reporting database. Ann Pharmacother 39(7–8):1194–1197. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E589 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarMuratsu D, Yoshiga D, Taketomi T et al (2013) Zoledronic acid enhances lipopolysaccharide-stimulated proinflammatory reactions through controlled expression of SOCS1 in macrophages. PLoS One 8(7):e67906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067906 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarOtt SM (2012) Bisphosphonate safety and efficacy in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 82(8):833–835. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.253 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarPapapetrou PD (2009) Bisphosphonate-associated adverse events. Horm Int J Endocrinol Metab 8(2):96–110Google ScholarPerazella MA, Markowitz GS (2008) Bisphosphonate nephrotoxicity. Kidney Int 74(11):1385–1393. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.356 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarPillon NJ, Azizi PM, Li YE et al (2015) Palmitate-induced inflammatory pathways in human adipose microvascular endothelial cells promote monocyte adhesion and impair insulin transcytosis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 309(1):E35–E44. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00611.2014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarPolinati PP, Eskelin P, Tyni T (2009) Fat Acid Oxid Disord. doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0003067.pub2 Google ScholarRoelofs AJ, Thompson K, Gordon S, Rogers MJ (2006) Molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: current status. Clin Cancer Res 12(20):6222S–6230S. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0843 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarSanchez-Nino MD, Fernandez-Fernandez B, Perez-Gomez MV et al (2015) Albumin-induced apoptosis of tubular cells is modulated by BASP1. Cell Death Dis 6:e1644. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarSanjabi S, Zenewicz LA, Kamanaka M, Flavell RA (2009) Anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory roles of TGF-β, IL-10, and IL-22 in immunity and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Pharmacol 9(4):447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.04.008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarSusztak K, Ciccone E, McCue P, Sharma K, Bottinger EP (2005) Multiple metabolic hits converge on CD36 as novel mediator of tubular epithelial apoptosis in diabetic nephropathy. PLoS Med 2(2):e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020045 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarToussaint ND, Elder GJ, Kerr PG (2009) Bisphosphonates in chronic kidney disease; balancing potential benefits and adverse effects on bone and soft tissue. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4(1):221–233. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02550508 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarTsou PS, Haak AJ, Khanna D, Neubig RR (2014) Cellular mechanisms of tissue fibrosis. 8. Current and future drug targets in fibrosis: focus on Rho GTPase-regulated gene transcription. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 307(1):C2–C13. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00060.2014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholarvan Beek J, van Meurs M, A‘t Hart BA et al (2005) Decay-accelerating factor (CD55) is expressed by neurons in response to chronic but not acute autoimmune central nervous system inflammation associated with complement activation. J Immunol 174(4):2353–2365. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2353 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarVerhulst A, Sun S, McKenna CE, D’Haese PC (2015) Endocytotic uptake of zoledronic acid by tubular cells may explain its renal effects in cancer patients receiving high doses of the compound. PLoS One 10(3):e0121861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121861 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarWei W, Schwaid AG, Wang X et al (2016) Ligand activation of ERRα by cholesterol mediates statin and bisphosphonate effects. Cell Metab 23(3):479–491. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarYoon SJ, Foley JW, Baker JC (2015) HEB associates with PRC2 and SMAD2/3 to regulate developmental fates. Nat Commun 6:6546. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7546 CrossRefPubMedGoogle ScholarZhan M, Kanwar YS (2014) Hierarchy of molecules in TGF-β1 signaling relevant to myofibroblast activation and renal fibrosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 307(4):F385–F387. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00338.2014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarZhao X, Sun K, Lan Z et al (2017) Tenofovir and adefovir down-regulate mitochondrial chaperone TRAP1 and succinate dehydrogenase subunit B to metabolically reprogram glucose metabolism and induce nephrotoxicity. Sci Rep 7:46344. doi: 10.1038/srep46344 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle ScholarCopyright information© The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.Authors and AffiliationsLili Cheng1Mengmeng Ge12Zhou Lan1Zhilong Ma1Wenna Chi13Wenhua Kuang1Kun Sun1Xinbin Zhao1Ye Liu1Yaqian Feng1Yuedong Huang1Maoguo Luo2Liping Li1Bin Zhang4Xiaoyu Hu4Lina Xu5Xiaohui Liu5Yi Huo6Haiteng Deng6Jinliang Yang3Qiaoran Xi2Yonghui Zhang13Julie A. Siegenthaler7Ligong Chen13Email author1.School of Pharmaceutical SciencesTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina2.School of Life SciencesTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina3.Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, West China Medical SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina4.Institute of Immunology, School of MedicineTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina5.Technology Center for Protein Sciences, School of Life SciencesTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina6.MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, School of Life SciencesTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina7.Department of Pediatrics, Denver-Anschutz Medical CampusUniversity of ColoradoAuroraUSA About this article CrossMark Cite this article as: Cheng, L., Ge, M., Lan, Z. et al. Arch Toxicol (2018) 92: 469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2048-0 Received 15 June 2017 Accepted 28 August 2017 First Online 04 September 2017 DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2048-0 Publisher Name Springer Berlin Heidelberg Print ISSN 0340-5761 Online ISSN 1432-0738 About this journal Reprints and Permissions Personalised recommendations Cite article How to cite? .RIS Papers Reference Manager RefWorks Zotero .ENW EndNote .BIB BibTeX JabRef Mendeley Share article Download PDF Actions Download PDF Cite article How to cite? .RIS Papers Reference Manager RefWorks Zotero .ENW EndNote .BIB BibTeX JabRef Mendeley Share article Table of contents Article Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion Notes Supplementary material References Copyright information Authors and Affiliations About this article Advertisement Hide Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips Switch Edition Academic Edition Corporate Edition Home Impressum Legal information Privacy statement How we use cookies Accessibility Contact us Springer Nature © 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature. Not logged in Not affiliated 173.244.217.52 (function() { var linkEl = document.querySelector('.js-ctm'); var scriptsList = []; var polyfillFeatures = ''; window.SpringerLink = window.SpringerLink || {}; window.SpringerLink.staticLocation = '/springerlink-static/1645515599'; window.eventTrackerInstance = null; if (window.matchMedia && window.matchMedia(linkEl.media).matches) { (function(h){h.className = h.className.replace('no-js', 'js')})(document.documentElement); polyfillFeatures = 'default,fetch,Promise,Object.setPrototypeOf,Object.entries,Number.isInteger,MutationObserver,startsWith,Array.prototype.includes,Array.from,IntersectionObserver'; scriptsList = [ 'https://cdn.polyfill.io/v2/polyfill.min.js?features=' + polyfillFeatures + '&flags=gated', window.SpringerLink.staticLocation + '/js/main.js' ]; scriptsList.forEach(function(script) { var tag = document.createElement('script'); tag.async = false; tag.src = script; document.body.appendChild(tag); }); } })(); var adSlot = '270604982/springerlink/204/article'; var definedSlots = [ {slot: [728, 90], containerName: 'doubleclick-leaderboard-ad'}, {slot: [160, 600], containerName: 'doubleclick-ad'}, {slot: [2, 2], containerName: 'doubleclick-native-ad'} ];